Evaluation of Retentive Strength of 50 Endodontically-Treated Single-Rooted Mandibular Second Premolars Restored with Cast Post Cores Using 5 Common Luting (Cement) Agents

Monika Singh; Soundarya Singh; Lakshya Kumar; Khurshid A. Mattoo; Imran Khalid; Mohammad Zahir Kota; Samuel Ebele Udeabor; Fawaz Abdul Hamid Baig; Mohammad Ishfaq; Mohammed Ibrahim; Sulphi Abdul Basheer

doi:10.12659/MSM.944110

30 April 2024: Lab/In Vitro Research

Evaluation of Retentive Strength of 50 Endodontically-Treated Single-Rooted Mandibular Second Premolars Restored with Cast Post Cores Using 5 Common Luting (Cement) Agents

Monika Singh ^1ABCEF** , Soundarya Singh ^2ACDEF , Lakshya Kumar ^3ABDEF , Khurshid A. Mattoo ^4ACDEF* , Imran Khalid ^5CDEG , Mohammad Zahir Kota ^5CDEF , Samuel Ebele Udeabor ^5CDEFG , Fawaz Abdul Hamid Baig ^5CDEF , Muhammad Ishfaq ^5CDEFG , Mohammed Ibrahim ^5CDEF , Sulphi Abdul Basheer ^5CDEG

DOI: 10.12659/MSM.944110

Med Sci Monit 2024; 30:e944110

Authors information Article notes Copyright and License information

Introduction Material and Methods Results Discussion Conclusions References

View HTML version

Figure 3 Graphic presentation of comparative differences in mean adhesive failure stresses between cast post and natural root using different luting agents (pairwise comparison). Figure created using MS Excel sheet, version 20H2 (OS build 19042,1466), Windows 11 Pro, Microsoft corporation).

Back to the Article

Evaluation of Retentive Strength of 50 Endodontically-Treated Single-Rooted Mandibular Second Premolars Restored with Cast Post Cores Using 5 Common Luting (Cement) Agents

Your Privacy