18 July 2022>: Meta-Analysis
Comparison of Hysteroscopic Morcellation Versus Resectoscopy in Treatment of Patients with Endometrial Lesions: A Meta-Analysis
Fangying Ren 1BEFG* , Guannan Huang 2BEF* , Xue Wang 3CDE* , Xuehui Li 4AD* , Jianning Cai 5ACD*DOI: 10.12659/MSM.936771
Med Sci Monit 2022; 28:e936771
Table 1 General information of the literature.
Study | Country | Age | Number of patients | Intervention measures | Experiment type of research | Outcomes* | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Experimental | Control | Experimental | Control | Experimental | Control | ||||
van Dongen et al, 2008 | Netherlands | 48.2±12.4 | 49.0±10.9 | 30 | 30 | Hysterectomy morcellation with TRUCLEAR system | Conventional resectoscopy | Randomized controlled trial | 2, 3, 4 |
Smith et al, 2014 | UK | 54.3±12.7 | 54.9±14.2 | 62 | 59 | Hysterectomy morcellation with TRUCLEAR system | Conventional resectoscopy with bipolar Versapoint | Randomized controlled clinical trial | 2, 4 |
Pampalona et al, 2015 | Spain | 55 | 52 | 63 | 64 | Hysterectomy morcellation with TRUCLEAR system | Conventional resectoscopy with bipolar Versapoint system | Randomized controlled clinical trial | 1, 2, 4 |
Hamerlynck et al, 2015 | Netherlands | 50±10 | 51±12 | 44 | 40 | Hysterectomy morcellation with TRUCLEAR system | Conventional resectoscopy | Randomized controlled trial | 1, 2, 3, 4 |
Stoll et al, 2020 | France | 56.2±12.3 | 52.8±9.9 | 45 | 45 | Reusable hysteroscopic morcellator with TRUCLEAR system | Conventional resectoscopy with a Fr 21 or Fr 27 monopolar resector or a Fr 26 bipolar resector (Karl Storz GmbH, Tuttlingen, Germany) | Single-center randomized prospective single-blind trial | 1, 2, 3, 4 |
van Wessel et al, 2021 | Netherlands, Belgium | 45±7 | 44±8 | 45 | 38 | Hysterectomy morcellation with TRUCLEAR system | Conventional resectoscopy with bipolar Versapoint system | Randomized controlled trial | 1, 2, 3, 4 |
* 1. Procedure time; 2. Operating time; 3. Fluid deficit; 4. Success rate. |