23 August 2022>: Meta-Analysis
Optimal Surgical Treatment Method for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture: Results from a Network Meta-Analysis
Yudi Wu 1CDEF , Yajia Li 2BCD , Jia Guo 2BC , Qiangxiang Li 34BC , Jianhuang Wu 35BCD , Ziqin Cao 5ABCDEF* , Yulin Song 6ABCDEF*DOI: 10.12659/MSM.937118
Med Sci Monit 2022; 28:e937118
Table 7 The league plots of postoperative laxity. Main network analysis (red) and subgroup analysis (blue). (From the top left to the bottom right, higher comparator vs lower comparator, SMD with 95% CI).
Autograft | −0.29 (−1.61, 1.04) | 0.03 (−0.90, 0.96) | 0.31 (−0.31, 0.93) | 0.81 (0.07, 1.55) | 2.32 (1.74, 2.89) |
−0.05 (−0.46, 0.36) | nwaRepair | 0.32 (−1.12, 1.75) | 0.60 (−0.86, 2.07) | 1.10 (−0.42, 2.61) | 2.60 (1.15, 4.06) |
−0.14 (−0.55, 0.27) | −0.09 (−0.60, 0.43) | waRepair | 0.29 (−0.84, 1.41) | 0.78 (−0.41, 1.97) | 2.29 (1.18, 3.40) |
−0.22 (−0.56, 0.12) | −0.17 (−0.70, 0.36) | −0.08 (−0.61, 0.45) | nirAllograft | 0.49 (−0.46, 1.45) | 2.00 (1.18, 2.82) |
−0.33 (−0.70, 0.04) | −0.28 (−0.83, 0.28) | −0.19 (−0.75, 0.36) | −0.11 (−0.61, 0.39) | Hybrid | 1.51 (0.73, 2.28) |
−1.41 (−1.74, −1.08) | −1.36 (−1.88, −0.83) | −1.27 (−1.80, −0.74) | −1.19 (−1.64, −0.73) | −1.08 (−1.51, −0.65) | irAllograft |